Concerns about 6.01 will address conflicts of interest that continue to this day of board members with documented interests in and work with charter schools. Here is the online listing today for the International Leadership of Texas (ILT) Board on which DISD Board President Edwin Flores sits.
While the student achievements at ILT are similar to achievements at DISD according to the most recent Texas Academic Performance Reports, ILT has twice the percentage of students who are not affected by family poverty. ILT also has almost three times the percentage of students who are not affected by any educational disability. This is data taken from the 2017-18 Texas Academic Performance Reports. Is the goal of the DISD trustee on the ILT Board to bring ILT up to DISD standards so they can better compete for DISD students? How is that not a conflict?
Item 7.03 is addressing potential contracts with pre-k providers who have a history of contracts with DISD. One issue openly discussed are allegations that some of these providers encourage parents after Pre-k to take their child to schools outside DISD. How can you decide on these contracts without having a report on the percentage of their pre-k students that have a history of then enrolling the next year in DISD schools?
Due to today's very misleading Dallas Morning News Editorial I must focus the errors DISD is spreading to the public that are reflected in this editorial.
The TEI system is focusing teacher raises on the highest White enrollment schools and on the schools serving the lowest percentage of children from families of poverty.
A study was done this past November using data from an open records release covering the average teacher salaries in each DISD school over the past three years. The data showed a $423 difference in 2015 between the 20 schools with less than 70% poverty and the 216 schools with over 70% poverty. Over the next three years under TEI that difference exploded to $3,953! This also contradicts today's Dallas Morning News editorial. Significant corrections are needed to TEI!
See the data at http://billbetzen.blogspot.com/2018/11/dallas-isd-teacher-excellence.html
Using data on teacher salaries found in the most recent Texas Academic Performance Reports tells the story of the Dallas ISD Teacher Effectiveness Initiative (TEI) giving raises to teachers of the most White schools which do not have the highest School Effectiveness Indices scores! This contradicts the Morning News Editorial! See http://billbetzen.blogspot.com/2019/02/higher-dallas-isd-teacher-salaries-are.html?m=1
The most consistent issue driving all these problems is an ongoing lack of transparency within DISD.
About two years ago there was active trustee discussion during board meetings about having a report made on the students trasferring during the school year into Dallas ISD from charter schools. They wanted a report to be made on these students as to achievement status and the schools they were transferring from. Then a person sitting on a charter board became DISD Board President and these discussions were never repeated nor were any such reports made public. Where are these reports?
Other transparency discussions and proposals given to the board include expanding the School Information Files, now online at the DISD Data Portal. The proposal made was to add about 200 additional variables for each school to these initial 40 variables given for each of the 266 schools and academies. This data is now available in a 40 item spreadsheet with each of the 266 schools and academies being one row in the spreadsheet.
Lack of data transparency underlines the hypocrisy of Dallas ISD in claiming to be working toward racial equity. What is DISD hiding?
It is much more than having teachers in the 3 schools with over 50% White students now making almost $10,000 more than the average salary of all other 98% of teachers in DISD serving schools with less than 50% White enrollment. It is much more than the average $423 more that teachers in the DISD schools with less than 70% poverty were making in 2015, and that difference exploding to $3,953 after three years of TEI.
Where can we go to verify that all DISD schools are being funded equitably with one simple look at the data and without having to spend hours collecting data from multiple sources?