Such a well designed School Equity Spreadsheet will allow anyone to explore instantly any of these 90+ variables and the relationships between them in any single school, or in any sub-grouping of the 228 Dallas ISD schools. Here is a first detailed draft of suggested variables being requested from the Legal Services, Public Information Request Division in Dallas ISD for this spreadsheet:
(To see the second draft adding 5 variables based on feedback from this first draft for a new total of 95 variables, go to http://billbetzen.blogspot.com/2018/04/disd-school-equity-spreadsheet-design.html)
Item #
|
School Equity Spreadsheet Column
data - one school per row with one column for each following data item:
|
1
|
Date Data is recorded
|
2
|
School Year represented in this data
|
3
|
School Name
|
4
|
Street Address
|
5
|
zip code
|
6
|
Census tract
|
Enrollment
|
|
7
|
# in pk
|
8
|
# in k
|
9
|
# in 1
|
10
|
# in 2
|
11
|
# in 3
|
12
|
# in 4
|
13
|
# in 5
|
14
|
# in 6
|
15
|
# in 7
|
16
|
# in 8
|
17
|
# in 9
|
18
|
# in 10
|
19
|
# in 11
|
20
|
# in 12
|
21
|
total enrollment
|
22
|
total enrollment capacity
|
23
|
White student enrollment
|
24
|
African American Enrollment
|
25
|
Hispanic Student Enrollment
|
26
|
American Indian Enrollment
|
27
|
Asian Enrollment
|
28
|
Hawaiian Enrollment
|
29
|
Multi-racial Enrollment
|
30
|
Ethnicity not reported
|
31
|
Total Female Students
|
32
|
Total Male Students
|
33
|
LEP total
|
34
|
BE
|
35
|
ESL
|
36
|
Sheltered
|
37
|
DEN
|
38
|
Not Served
|
39
|
LEP SPED
|
40
|
BE not LEP
|
41
|
LEP exit
|
42
|
Special Education
|
43
|
TAG
|
44
|
Economically Disadvantaged
|
Teacher Information
|
|
45
|
Total number teachers
|
46
|
White teachers
|
47
|
African teachers
|
48
|
Hispanic teachers
|
49
|
American teachers
|
50
|
Asian teachers
|
51
|
Hawaiian teachers
|
52
|
Multi-racial teachers
|
53
|
Total Female teachers
|
54
|
Total Male teachers
|
Achievement information:
|
|
55
|
School Effectiveness Indices for this school year
|
56
|
Percentage of students approaching standards in STARR
|
57
|
Percentage of students meeting standards in STARR
|
58
|
Percentage of students mastering standards in STARR
|
Expenditures by Object (Objects
6100-6600) - Data from PEIMS Standard Financial Reports
|
|
59
|
Total Expenditures all funds per student
|
60
|
Operating-Payroll all funds per student
|
61
|
Other Operating all funds per student
|
62
|
Non-Operating(Equipt/Supplies) all funds per student
|
Expenditures by Function (Objects
6100-6400 Only)
|
|
63
|
Total Operating Expenditures all funds per student
|
64
|
Instruction (11,95) * all funds per student
|
65
|
Instructional Res/Media (12) * all funds per student
|
66
|
Curriculum/Staff Develop (13) * all funds per student
|
67
|
Instructional Leadership (21) * all funds per student
|
68
|
School Leadership (23) * all funds per student
|
69
|
Guidance/Counseling Svcs (31) * all funds per student
|
70
|
Social Work Services (32) * all funds per student
|
71
|
Health Services (33) * all funds per student
|
72
|
Food (35) ** all funds per student
|
73
|
Extracurricular (36) * all funds per student
|
74
|
Plant Maint/Operation (51) * ** all funds per student
|
75
|
Security/Monitoring (52) * ** all funds per student
|
76
|
Data Processing Svcs (53)* ** all funds per student
|
Program expenditures by Program
(Objects 6100-6400 only)
|
|
77
|
Total Operating Expenditures all funds per student
|
78
|
Regular all funds per student
|
79
|
Gifted & Talented all funds per student
|
80
|
Career & Technical all funds per student
|
81
|
Students with Disabilities all funds per student
|
82
|
Accelerated Education all funds per student
|
83
|
Bilingual all funds per student
|
84
|
Nondisc Alted-AEP Basic Serv all funds per student
|
85
|
Disc Alted-DAEP Basic Serv all funds per student
|
86
|
Disc Alted-DAEP Supplemental all funds per student
|
87
|
T1 A Schoolwide-St Comp >=40% all funds per student
|
88
|
Athletic Programming all funds per student
|
89
|
High School Allotment all funds per student
|
90
|
Prekindergarten all funds per student
|
The above 90 data items come from the Dallas ISD Data Portal (items 2-58) and from the PEIMS Standard Financial Reports maintained by TEA (items 59-90).
Yes, this data is freely available on every school, but not in this spreadsheet format which will make it very easy to compare equity and save hundreds of hours of work which de facto keep this data and the equity comparisons from being transparent.
Full Community support is needed to demand the release of this full information in this format. The Dallas NAACP at their 4-3-18 meeting voted to support the release of this data in this format. The 70 or more members present voted unanimously to support this open records request to become a critical step in the work toward verifying, securing, and maintaining equity in Dallas ISD for all students.
Today, 4-10-18, all members present at the monthly Our Community Our Schools meeting voted to support this open records request.
Yes, this data is freely available on every school, but not in this spreadsheet format which will make it very easy to compare equity and save hundreds of hours of work which de facto keep this data and the equity comparisons from being transparent.
Full Community support is needed to demand the release of this full information in this format. The Dallas NAACP at their 4-3-18 meeting voted to support the release of this data in this format. The 70 or more members present voted unanimously to support this open records request to become a critical step in the work toward verifying, securing, and maintaining equity in Dallas ISD for all students.
Today, 4-10-18, all members present at the monthly Our Community Our Schools meeting voted to support this open records request.
Other organizations dedicated to equity among all students in DISD are also being approached. They include LULAC, CASE (Coalition for an Accountable System of Education), both Dallas teacher organizations, NEA and AFT, the Dallas League of Women Voters, and others. The members contacted to date have all voiced support for this open records request, but a formal vote at a membership meeting has only been done by the Dallas NAACP and Our Community Our Schools.
The goal is for as many education advocates and organizations as possible to support this open records request, know what the battle is for, and understand what to expect with this new level of transparency.
Some DISD Board Members have been contacted about this request and the support for it is universal so far. They can speak for themselves.
This open records request, submitted 4-9-18, is a significant step toward potentially the highest level of transparency related to the nuances of equity in DISD History. The above specific list of 90 variables will be submitted on 4-16-18 to the DISD Legal Services, Public Information Request Division.
Again, while this open records request deals with data that is public in a multitude of separate settings by school, that data has never been available in this single spreadsheet format by school. That simple change will allow schools to be compared by any of these multiple demographic, financial, achievement, or funding variables in the battle toward studying, verifying, achieving, and maintaining equity for every DISD student. This transparency will allow public confidence in Dallas ISD to continue to grow, unless there is a fight against such transparency by Dallas ISD.
It is hoped there will be no problems with fulfilling this request. It is certainly understood that more discussion may be needed. We welcome questions working toward the most accurate information possible.
Once the study of this format for a spreadsheet starts, it is
very possible we may find variables that should be added to the spreadsheet for
each school. Suggestions are welcomed so that such additions are done up front
and not needed later.
Imagine the power of such a spreadsheet in order by the amount of "regular" funding per child allocated in each school. Given recent history, it is reasonable to expect that schools with the largest amount of "regular" funding per child will be those schools with the lowest percentage of economically disadvantaged students, or ESL students, or other need-based category of students. Such a pattern lessens the reality of need-based funds being truly supplementary. That is, they are no longer extra funds in addition to the equal allocation of "regular" funds should be received by all schools.
Imagine the power of such a spreadsheet in order by the amount of "regular" funding per child allocated in each school. Given recent history, it is reasonable to expect that schools with the largest amount of "regular" funding per child will be those schools with the lowest percentage of economically disadvantaged students, or ESL students, or other need-based category of students. Such a pattern lessens the reality of need-based funds being truly supplementary. That is, they are no longer extra funds in addition to the equal allocation of "regular" funds should be received by all schools.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.